Can a Black Swan 'Change' Obama?

Barack Obama gave a historic win to America, an event very hard to replicate anywhere in the world. People not just from USA , but from countries across the continents moved by his victory, his ability to reach the heights and to create hope.

Everybody knows he promised to bring 'change' for a better world with synchronizing assurance of his supporters singing with him- 'Yes, We can!'. It was such a rosy picture and I sincerely hope it stays that way.

Obama was very quick to assume responsibility and started to jump on the mess created by the 8 horrific years under Bush. Tasks to take on are unsurmountable.
The victory gave a chance for America's enemies to put him on test. Militant outfits in Iraq and Afghanistan sent out a message not much different than their previous ones; Russia wants to build a missile system near Poland; Iran was happy with his election (which might make Israel a bit nervous); un-employment reached 14 year high; Auto companies going bankrupt; and of course Wall street was not really happy with his election.

The first two initiatives Obama has taken were totally disappointing to me.

1. Stimulus package - which has not worked and never will
2. Appointment of Rahm Emanuel

So much for 'Change' and 'hope', that Rahm was appointed on chief-of-staff position?? A pro-war Zionist, Freddie Mac board member during its drive towards the cliff's edge, sitting in a position which decides what information President must get and also appoint people in key White house jobs. Aaah, Please!!

More questions arise:

• Will Obama govern by wisdom or ideology - polished version of Bush's way of governance?
  
• Can Obama's 'Change' handle a Black Swan, geo-political or financial??

A Black Swan event can land him in the same position as Bush was after 9/11. Such an event can come from geo-political means or economic means. Nobody knows. A major attack, a financial catastrophe, a preemptive strike on any nation in middle east...we never know who will test the waters in the present perception of US weaker financially.

Real change under Obama will be when he does not curtail freedom of people and start new fronts of war with same kind of warmongering as previous regime did. The trust factor can sweep many Americans towards him and it is quite dangerous.

On the economic front, If he goes on to increase taxes, it will be no better than what Hoover did before Great Depression. He has to realize that more Government involvement is the problem.

Obama is smart, has sense of judgment. But, real 'Change' will come when he does not rattle in such huge problems as he didnot during all the speeches he gave.

People are losing trust in Capitalistic system. If Obama fails to deliver, they might as well start questioning Democratic system.

whats in bailouts dude?

Bailout to banks everywhere...what exactly is happening and what does it mean?

Bailout, as done by US and EU countries here means helping people who do scams so large that its better to get them out of mess than admitting mistakes for allowing it to happen. Its just that!

So, now what about the common people who lost money for mistakes of bunch of casino traders? - They can protest in front of some political offices and go back home cribbing.

Will the bailout really solves something? NO, NOT AT ALL. Close to trillion dollars have been used as bailout so far, across the continents. Nothing happens because you are trying to value assets whose worth you don't know at all.

Where does govts get that money from? They print money....simple and straight. That cause inflation as more supply increases.

Is it better if not bailed out? YES! Countries might have financial problem for following couple of years, then markets will correct themselves. Its better than debasing the currency and getting into bigger trouble.

Here is the longstanding crusader against this form of corporate socialism: